Back to search
2201.02019

On the Hilbert Number for Piecewise Linear Vector Fields with Algebraic Discontinuity Set

Douglas D. Novaes

correcthigh confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves L(2k) ≥ k^2+2k+1 and L(2k+1) ≥ k^2+2k+3 via a second-order Melnikov analysis plus an ECT-system argument and a pseudo-Hopf bifurcation, with careful exponent bookkeeping for the nonlinear switching curve. The candidate solution reaches the same numerical bounds but its derivation has multiple errors: it (i) miscounts the independent functions by including j=0 terms that violate the positivity condition on exponents, (ii) claims only two (rather than three) additional basis functions from the linear perturbations, and (iii) claims an ECT-system can realize as many simple zeros as its dimension (instead of dimension minus one). Hence, the paper’s argument is correct and complete, while the model’s proof is flawed in several key steps, even though the final bounds match.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The work achieves a notable advance by establishing quadratic lower bounds for L(n) via a refined second-order Melnikov analysis adapted to nonlinear switching manifolds, coupled with a carefully engineered ECT-system. The argument is sound and the construction is explicit. I suggest major revisions to further clarify the Melnikov reduction steps, unify notation, and make the exponent bookkeeping even more transparent for readers outside the immediate subcommunity.