2201.02100
SCATTERING RIGIDITY FOR ANALYTIC METRICS
Yannick Guedes Bonthonneau, Colin Guillarmou, Malo Jezequel
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves that for real-analytic compact manifolds with analytic strictly convex boundary, no conjugate points, and hyperbolic trapped set, equality of the scattering data under a fixed boundary identification yields a boundary-fixing analytic isometry; notably, travel time is not required (Theorem 2 and the surrounding discussion emphasize this point) . The model’s solution is logically sound but proceeds via an extra step: it first recovers the travel time using the exactness identity S*α∂ − α∂ = dτ and the fact that τ vanishes on the glancing set—facts consistent with the paper’s setup, where τg is defined, analytic off Γg−, and equals 0 on ∂+SM ∪ ∂0SM , and where Sg is defined as the boundary scattering map . The final step then invokes the same scattering rigidity theorem. Hence both reach the same conclusion, but the paper’s proof is different and does not use the reduction to lens data.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript proves a strong scattering rigidity result in the analytic category with hyperbolic trapped sets and no conjugate points. The strategy—determining the metric near the boundary from scattering data, analyzing the geodesic flow resolvent, and constructing an analytic embedding via an elliptic normal operator—appears technically sound and novel in this setting. The exposition is clear, though a few additional explanations could benefit readers less familiar with analytic microlocal techniques and the distinctions between scattering and lens rigidity.