2201.03682
Upper bound on the rate of mixing for the Earthquake flow on moduli spaces
Etienne Bonnafoux
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Note/Short/Other
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves that any uniform polynomial mixing bound for the earthquake flow on P^1 M_g must have exponent d ≤ 6g−5, using test functions supported where the systole is small together with Minsky–Weiss nondivergence and explicit Lipschitz and volume estimates; see Theorem 1.2 and the end of Section 3 (inequality (2) leading to µ^{6g−5} ≤ const·µ^d) . The candidate solution independently reaches the same exponent by building Lipschitz bump functions on the lamination factor, exploiting that the earthquake flow fixes the lamination coordinate, and comparing the covariance lower bound (∼δ^{6g−7}) with the Lipschitz norms (∼δ^{-1}) to obtain the obstruction δ^{6g−5} ≲ t^{−d}. The logic aligns with the paper’s conclusion, though a minor technical point in the candidate’s write-up needs stating (uniform control of the small-ball Thurston mass or using a mean-zero bump to avoid the mean term). Overall, both arguments correctly force d ≤ 6g−5; the proofs are different in construction and tools, but consistent in outcome .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} note/short/other \textbf{Justification:} The note cleanly establishes a sharp upper bound d ≤ 6g−5 for any polynomial mixing rate of the earthquake flow, thereby excluding exponential mixing. The proof is compact and relies on standard, well-chosen tools. While technically sound, minor edits to consolidate constants, streamline parameter choices, and tidy a few typographical issues would enhance readability. The contribution is focused, correct, and of interest to specialists studying quantitative dynamics on moduli spaces.