2201.06631
Effective error estimation for model reduction with inhomogeneous initial conditions
Björn Liljegren-Sailer
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 2 derives the augmented error system, partitions its observability Gramian, and uses the standard energy identity to obtain ||y_{x0} - ŷ_{x0}||_L2^2 = x0^T Q x0 + 2 x0^T Q̊ W^T x0 + x0^T W Q̂ W^T x0 (their eq. (12)), then inserts an arbitrary low-rank factor U with Q ≈ U^T U to get the exact identity ||y_{x0} - ŷ_{x0}||_L2 = sqrt(Δ_{x0}^2 + x0^T (Q - U^T U) x0) and the spectral-norm bound (Theorem 2) under A, Â Hurwitz. This is exactly the model’s approach: same augmented system, same Gramian block equations (11a–c), same energy argument, same decomposition with U^T U, same norm bound, and the same exactness when U is a Cholesky factor. Therefore both are correct and follow substantially the same proof path, differing only in minor notation and level of detail. Key steps are explicitly stated in the paper’s Sections 4.1–4.2 and Theorem 2 (see the construction of the error system and Gramian blocks and eq. (12) in 4.2, and the theorem statement and its proof) , with the underlying observability energy identity recalled in Section 2 (eq. (4)) .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The estimator and bound are correct and useful, with a neat observability-Gramian viewpoint that unifies prior approaches. The proof is concise and relies on standard identities. Minor clarifications and signposting would further improve accessibility without altering the core contribution.