Back to search
2201.07327

Hermite-based, One-step, Variational and Galerkin Time Integrators for Mechanical Systems

Harsh Sharma, Mayuresh Patil, Craig Woolsey

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper derives explicit amplification matrices for the SHO and concludes: (i) both one-step schemes are symplectic for linear systems and generally not canonically symplectic for nonlinear systems, and (ii) stability windows are z ∈ [0, √10] ∪ [√12, √60] (Galerkin) and z ∈ [0, √(28/3)] ∪ [√10, √42] (variational) — all supported by the printed matrices/eigenvalue forms and a Jacobian-based symplectic check . The candidate reaches the same qualitative conclusions and stability intervals, but their stated update matrices contain inaccuracies (notably, they claim equal diagonals for the variational Az, which contradicts the paper’s matrix; and they use inconsistent denominators in the Galerkin Az) and lean on an unnecessary “equal-diagonals” criterion for symplecticity. Net: core conclusions agree; several formula-level details in the model are incorrect, while the paper’s statements are consistent with its displayed matrices and checks .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript develops and contrasts one-step Hermite-based variational and Galerkin integrators, provides explicit linear stability regions, and carefully checks symplecticity for both linear and nonlinear settings. The analysis is sound and useful. Minor presentation issues (uniform normalization of amplification matrices, small typographical slips) can be addressed easily without altering conclusions.