Back to search
2201.09576

Equivalent integrable metrics on the sphere with quartic invariants

A.V. Tsiganov

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Proposition 1 states the map ρ: yi = sqrt(bi/H) pxi together with the orthogonality constraint xipxi + yipyi = 0 preserves the Dirac–Poisson bracket on T*Sn−1, the constraints Σx2=1 and Σxipi=0, and the quadratic Hamiltonian H=Σ bi p^2; it also derives ρ(T)=Σ bi ci pxi^2 + H Σ ai bi^{-1} x_i^2 when applied to a second quadratic geodesic Hamiltonian T (all asserted as a straightforward verification). The candidate solution’s Part A–B explicitly performs these bracket computations and substitutions (matching the paper’s claims), and confirms the preservation of constraints and of H, as in the text establishing (2.3)–(2.5) . For n=3 and bi=1, the paper shows that T has a quadratic integral J=√(w(x))H while ρ(T) has no quadratic polynomial integral but does have the quartic integral ρ(J2); this is asserted and exhibited around (2.6)–(2.7) and the discussion following them, in agreement with Part C of the solution (the solution also gives a natural proof idea via pushforward/pullback under the Poisson automorphism ρ) . The paper’s Proposition 2 introduces σ=ρ(c)∘ρ(b) with the identities xipxi = x̃ip̃xi and (bi/H) pxi^2 = (ci/Ĥ) p̃xi^2 (its printed layout in (2.8) is compressed, but the intended relation is clear), and states that σ is canonical . The candidate’s Part D matches this construction and uses it to argue the equivalence of three geodesic metrics H(1), H(2), H(3) written in elliptic coordinates (the paper presents these three cases and proves their equivalence under σ in Proposition 7) . Minor issues in the candidate solution include a few sign slips in intermediate Poisson-derivative identities (which cancel in the final bracket computations) and an extra square on a factor in the squared identity relating momenta after σ; the paper’s own presentation also omits detailed calculations and compresses some formulas. Overall, the constructions and conclusions coincide and the proof strategies are essentially the same.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript cleanly constructs a discrete Poisson map on T*Sn−1 that preserves the Dirac bracket and maps geodesic Hamiltonians to geodesic Hamiltonians. It then applies this to produce families of equivalent integrable metrics on S2, including a case where a quadratic integral becomes quartic after the map. The examples are compelling and align with standard Benenti/Stäckel theory. The exposition would benefit from a few explicit computations and clearer display of the canonical map σ, but the results appear correct and of interest.