2202.00156
Nonormality, optimality and synchronization
Jeremie Fish, Erik Bollt
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper defines ε-Laplacian pseudospectra Φε(L), the ε-pseudospectral abscissa ζε(L), and Laplacian pseudospectral resilience LPR = −ζλ2(L)/λ2, and explicitly states that for normal graph Laplacians ζλ2 = 0 (hence LPR = 0), while non-normal Laplacians may have ζλ2 < 0, supporting the claim that LPR distinguishes stability within isospectral ‘optimal’ networks; this is backed by numerical evidence across a toy family (chain→star) with identical nonzero eigenvalues . The model’s solution supplies a largely correct proof sketch for the normal case and an explicit 3×3 counterexample demonstrating that two isospectral Laplacians (one normal, one with a Jordan block) yield different LPR. Minor notational slips in the model (confusing I_{n−1} with the projector Π) are easily repaired. Overall, both are correct, with the paper offering definitions and empirical evidence and the model giving a concise proof and example.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper makes a clear conceptual contribution by adapting pseudospectra to Laplacians and proposing LPR, with convincing numerical experiments showing its utility for selecting among isospectral optimal networks. While most claims are well-founded, a short proof of the normal case and clarification of basis-related implementation details would improve rigor. Overall, the work is solid and relevant to synchronization in directed networks.