2202.04892
VERTEX TO VERTEX GEODESICS ON PLATONIC SOLIDS
Serge Troubetzkoy
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves that no geodesic can start and end at the same vertex on the cube, tetrahedron, octahedron, or icosahedron via an unfolding argument and a refolding symmetry that yields a 180° rotational axis mapping endpoints to distinct vertices; it also notes the dodecahedron admits vertex-to-self geodesics. This is stated and sketched clearly in Theorem 1 and the subsequent case analysis for square and triangular tilings . The candidate model reproduces the correct conclusion, but its key parity–midpoint step on the triangular lattice is false: from m ≡ n (mod 2) it concludes the straight segment’s midpoint is always a lattice vertex, which is not true when both coordinates are odd (e.g., from (0,0) to (1,1) the midpoint is at half-integers). Thus the model’s proof is invalid for the triangular-lattice solids, even though the final conclusion coincides with the paper’s. The paper also correctly remarks that the dodecahedron is exceptional, admitting vertex-to-self trajectories .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} A concise, symmetry-focused proof of a known theorem is presented clearly and accessibly. The argument is correct and situates the dodecahedron exception appropriately. A minor typographical slip in the parity discussion should be corrected, but otherwise the paper is in good shape and suitable for publication as a short note.