Back to search
2202.05330

Data-driven sensor placement with shallow decoder networks

Jan Williams, Olivia Zahn, J. Nathan Kutz

incompletemedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s QR-with-SDN pipeline and its QR argument (maximizing a greedy volume surrogate via CPQR; Eq. 9–11) are standard and empirically supported, but largely heuristic without formal risk guarantees; its pruning results are also empirical and explained qualitatively (sensor clustering) . The model’s solution correctly reconstructs the CPQR logic and adds reasonable conditioning and noise-propagation analyses, but it implicitly assumes generalization when claiming SDN cannot underperform the linear POD map for fixed Φ, and it moves from MSE to relative-error ordering via an upper bound only—both require additional assumptions not present in the paper or proof sketch. Hence, both are incomplete: the paper for lack of formal performance guarantees, the model for unspoken assumptions about training and generalization.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper presents a pragmatic and effective combination of QR-based sensor placement with shallow decoder networks, supported by careful experiments and a clear negative result for magnitude-based pruning. The CPQR argument is standard and well-motivated but remains heuristic; pruning analysis is qualitative. Modest additions—clarifying theoretical claims, better quantification of pruning effects, and minor exposition fixes—would strengthen the contribution.