Back to search
2202.07903

Stability analysis of fixed point of fractional-order coupled map lattices

Sachin Bhalekar, Prashant M. Gade

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

Both the paper and the model reduce the linear fractional-order lattice to scalar eigenmodes via the Z-transform, obtain the same characteristic equation det(z(1−z^{-1})^α I − (A−I))=0, and identify the cardioid boundary β(t) by substituting z=e^{it}. They then specialize to 1D circulant A, giving the same spectra and the same stability regions for the symmetric (polygon via real slice) and asymmetric (family of scaled cardioids γ_j) cases. A small nuance: the paper states a linear real-axis bound 1−2α<λ<1 (used to produce linear polygonal regions) even though the exact cardioid slice is [1−2^α,1]; the model explicitly notes it uses the narrower [1−2α,1] only as a sufficient condition. Overall, the arguments align and are essentially the same, with the model adding minor analytic details (branch choice and Nyquist/argument principle). Key steps and formulas match the paper’s Eq. (10), its β(t) parameterization, circulant-eigenvalue formulas, and Theorems 3.1–3.4 as stated in the PDF .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The approach—Z-transform reduction to a scalar root condition and mapping the stability boundary to a cardioid in the eigenvalue plane—is methodologically sound and well-executed. The circulant specialization yields explicit, easily checkable regions for symmetric and asymmetric couplings, with correct identification of the most restrictive wavenumber. Minor clarifications are warranted concerning the exact real-axis slice of the cardioid (1−2\^α versus the conservative 1−2α bound used to construct linear polygons) and brief analytic remarks on branch choices and contour arguments.