2202.11218
Homeostatic Mechanisms in Biological Systems
Pedro P. A. Cardoso de Andrade, João L. O. Madeira, Fernando Antoneli
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 2.1 states that near-perfect homeostasis on D=(I0,+∞) implies either a critical point z′(Ic)=0 or a sequence In→∞ with z′(In)→0; if z′ is monotone then limI→∞ z′(I)=0. The proof uses sign analysis plus dyadic intervals to bound average slopes, yielding the vanishing-derivative sequence (and the monotone corollary) . The model’s solution proves essentially the same fact via a direct mean value theorem argument on expanding intervals, which actually shows (ii) always holds; it also supplies a clean argument for the monotone case. Thus both are correct, with closely related core ideas (average-slope bounds on long intervals) and the model offering a slightly sharper statement. Minor typos in the paper’s proof do not affect correctness.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The work correctly extends the input–output network framework to boundary-point infinitesimal homeostasis, and the main calculus result is sound. Minor typographical issues slightly obscure the proof flow; incorporating a succinct MVT-based argument would improve clarity. The contribution is well scoped and valuable within the homeostasis-in-networks literature.