2203.02011
The starting dates of COVID-19 multiple waves
Paulo Roberto de Lima Gianfelice, Ricardo Sovek Oyarzabal, Americo Cunha Jr, Jose Mario Vicensi Grzybowski, Fernando da Conceição Batista, Elbert E. N. Macau
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s procedure first applies an evidence screen to discard models whose inferred cases start-date upper bound is later than March 1, 2020, leaving τ ∈ {120,121,122,123}. It then selects among these using AIC/BIC (lowest) and, if needed, RMSE and R², choosing τ = 121 and concluding a first-wave cases upper-bound start date of February 29, 2020. The paper also reports upper-bound start dates for waves 2–6 as July 17, 2020; November 6, 2020; March 2, 2021; March 16, 2021; and July 9, 2021. The candidate solution reproduces these steps and results exactly, including the elimination set, the tie-break, the selected τ, and the listed start dates for waves 2–6. All of this matches the paper’s text, tables, and figures. See the evidence-screen and selection narrative, including the survivor set and tie-break to τ = 121 with cases upper bound on Feb 29, 2020, and the list of later-wave start upper bounds in the results section and figures.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper’s methodology is sound and its results align with surveillance evidence. The ensemble-and-screen approach is simple and implementable, and the selection outcomes are well supported by tables and figures. Clarifying the hypothesis testing step and the rationale for a fixed 11-day shift across all waves would improve transparency and robustness.