2203.03115
FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATION OF INVARIANT MANIFOLDS BY THE PARAMETERIZATION METHOD
Jorge Gonzalez, J.D. Mireles James, Necibe Tuncer
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper formulates the invariance equation F(P(θ)) = DP(θ) Λ θ for local unstable manifolds and, after expanding P as a multivariate power series, derives linear homological equations whose right-hand sides depend only on lower-order coefficients. In the PDE setting, these become linear elliptic problems which (in weak/finite-element form) are solved recursively (see the invariance equation and push-forward expansion, and the FEM homological equations and their recursive solution). The candidate solution reproduces exactly this coefficient-by-coefficient derivation in operator form, adds the standard non-resonance condition n·λ ∉ spec(DF(u0)) to guarantee invertibility of each elliptic resolvent, and emphasizes that the same boundary conditions are inherited by the coefficient problems. Up to this explicit non-resonance hypothesis—implicit in the paper’s FEM linear solves—the arguments align closely. See the paper’s Eq. (2.5) and series push-forward DP(θ)Λθ = Σ(n·λ) p_n θ^n, and the weak-form homological systems solved recursively for concrete PDEs .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript correctly derives and implements the parameterization method for local unstable manifolds of semilinear PDEs. The homological equations and recursive FEM solves are sound and well illustrated. The main improvement would be to make explicit the non-resonance assumption and the precise functional-analytic setting (spaces, boundary conditions) for the coefficient problems. These are presentational refinements rather than substantive changes.