2203.10306
Model-free Continuation of Periodic Orbits in Certain Nonlinear Systems Using Continuous-Time Adaptive Control
Yang Li, Harry Dankowicz
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper derives the same error model ė = A e + b θ̃^T Q(t,q), uses the composite Lyapunov V = e^T P e + (1/Γ) θ̃^T θ̃ to obtain V̇ = −e^T S e ≤ 0, proves boundedness and e ∈ L2, then applies a Barbalat-type argument to conclude e(t) → 0 and θ̃̇ → 0. Under persistent excitation of Q(t,q), the paper shows θ̃(t) → 0 via a mean-value/PE argument and then that x and u converge to T-periodic steady states determined by g, with non-invasiveness when r = q*. These are precisely the statements and steps in the candidate solution, which follows the same structure (Lyapunov + Barbalat + PE) and arrives at the same conclusions. Minor presentational differences exist (the model invokes a standard MRAC PE theorem; the paper uses an integral perturbation argument), but there is no substantive conflict. See the paper’s equations (9)–(14) for the setup and Lyapunov estimate and (18)–(21) for the PE-based parameter convergence and periodic steady-state claims .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript presents a correct and well-structured MRAC-based strategy for noninvasive control-based continuation with rigorous proofs of boundedness, tracking, and parameter convergence under PE, and clear conclusions about periodic steady-state behavior and noninvasiveness. The analysis is technically sound and aligns with standard adaptive control theory. Minor clarifications regarding regularity assumptions and some proof details would improve clarity without altering the results.