Back to search
2203.10971

Gradient-based parameter calibration of an anisotropic interaction model for pedestrian dynamics

Zhomart Turarov, Claudia Totzeck

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves existence of a minimizer for the parameter-calibration problem by a direct-method argument: it extracts weakly convergent subsequences in Y × Uad, uses weak continuity of the state operator e, and invokes weak lower semicontinuity of J to conclude Theorem 2 (existence of (y*,u*)) , with the state well-posedness built on Assumption 1 and Theorem 1 (Picard–Lindelöf) . The candidate solution instead reduces the problem to minimizing the reduced cost j(u)=J(S(u),u) on the compact set Uad and argues existence via continuity of the control-to-state map S and Weierstrass. Under the paper’s regularity assumptions (global boundedness and local Lipschitz for K, and well-posedness of the ODE), the reduced functional approach is valid. Minor caveats: (i) the candidate’s continuity proof implicitly assumes a collision-free trajectory tube (uniform minimal separation), which is stronger than needed; one can obtain continuity on bounded sets directly from the assumed local Lipschitz/continuity of the vector field; (ii) the paper asserts that the specific force in (5) satisfies Assumption 1, which needs clarification near xi=xj due to the unit-direction factor; nevertheless, the main existence theorem only relies on Assumption 1–2 and remains correct when those assumptions hold .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript provides a rigorous existence result for the calibration problem, derives first-order optimality conditions, and demonstrates a practical gradient-descent calibration using real data. The analysis is sound under stated assumptions and the exposition is clear. Some technical clarifications are advisable, notably regarding the behavior of the concrete force law near coincident positions, a minor compactness remark for the control set, and an explicit statement on continuity of the control-to-state map used later for gradients.