Back to search
2204.10353

A note on the invariants of the Volterra gyrostat and each of its known special cases, and implications for low order models∗

Ashwin K Seshadri, S Lakshmivarahan

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper derives the two invariants for the energy-conserving tVG (C1 = 1/2 Σ x_i^2 and C2 in Eq. (38)), relates C2 to M − K1^2E (Eq. (40)), and characterizes invariants for all subclasses via a linear system (Eq. (29)), including the non–energy-conserving case where the general model has no nontrivial quadratic–affine invariant; subclasses with two or one linear terms have one or two invariants respectively . The candidate solution reproduces these results by the same null-space conditions and explicit coefficient solving, with a small but immaterial additive-constant correction in the identification of C2 with M − K1^2E (a 1/2 factor on Σ h_i^2) consistent with invariance up to constants .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper presents a coherent, unified derivation of invariants for the tVG with and without energy conservation, using a clear null-space formulation. It reconciles special cases and explains systematically why the number of invariants depends on linear feedback terms. Only minor issues remain (notably a harmless constant-term slip in the C2–M–E identity and some presentation choices in degenerate subclasses).