2204.12298
Linear TDOA-based Measurements for Distributed Estimation and Localized Tracking
Mohammadreza Doostmohammadian, Themistoklis Charalambous
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper correctly sets up the error dynamics, motivates distributed observability via Kronecker-structured analysis, and claims that strong connectivity (irreducibility of W) suffices for observability and (hence) existence of stabilizing gains. However, it glosses over two key points: (i) the observer error update has the form A − K C A (with C = DH), so the standard Luenberger result should be invoked for the pair (A, C A) (or else one must assume A invertible to pass from (A, C) to (A, C A)); and (ii) the block-diagonal structure of K is not justified by the Kalman/Luenberger theorem and needs an explicit structured-feedback argument. The candidate solution fills gap (i) by making the “A invertible generically” step explicit and by arguing structural observability via output reachability and perfect matching, but it, too, is incomplete on (ii): it appeals to structural fixed-modes results to conclude that block-diagonal static output injection can stabilize generically, which is stronger than what those results ensure without further hypotheses. Net: both arguments trend in the right direction but omit necessary caveats and assumptions for the structured-gain step.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The contribution is practical and relevant: a linear TDOA model within a distributed estimation framework that appeals to structural observability to reduce communication burden. Simulations support the approach. However, the theoretical bridge from SC to the existence of stabilizing block-diagonal observer gains is not rigorously justified as written. The pairing in the Luenberger step should be corrected to (A, CA), and either an explicit invertibility assumption or a direct argument should be added. The structured (block-diagonal) gain feasibility requires a dedicated justification (e.g., a tailored structural fixed-mode argument) or a carefully stated limitation. These are central to correctness.