2204.14169
Fast data-driven model reduction for nonlinear dynamical systems
Joar Axås, Mattia Cenedese, George Haller
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s fastSSM derivation and formulas for the cubic 2D normal form, including T3 = G3/λ, T4 = G4/λ̄, T5 = G5/(2λ̄ − λ), and γ = 2 G3 T4 + G4 T̄4 + G4 T3 + 2 G5 T̄5 + G7, match the candidate solution exactly. The data-fitting steps (SVD-based tangent space, polynomial regression for manifold and reduced dynamics) and the recursive homological-equation approach to enforce conjugacy also align with the paper’s presentation. See the manifold/dynamics fitting and conjugacy setup (equations (11)–(15)) and the explicit cubic 2D normal form and coefficients (equations (16)–(19)) in the paper . Assumptions listed by the model (closeness to SSM, removal of transients, embedding/diffeomorphism, nonresonance, derivative estimation) are also articulated in the paper’s methodology and pre/post-processing sections, including SSM existence/uniqueness and data preprocessing (delay embedding, transient removal) . Minor wording differences (e.g., why quartic terms are absent in the cubic normal form remainder written as O(5)) do not change the outcome.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The submission delivers a fast, explicit alternative to SSMLearn with a cubic 2D normal form that is theoretically standard and practically useful. The derivations are consistent and the validation convincing. Minor clarifications (identifiability conditions, rationale for O(5) remainder in the 2D complex-pair normal form) would further improve accessibility for practitioners.