2205.03506
Matings of Cubic Polynomials with a Fixed Critical Point. Part II: Sufficiency of the Limb Condition
Thomas Sharland
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves that if two limbs L1 and L2 satisfy the limb condition Θ(L1) = −Θ(L2), then any postcritically finite Fa ∈ L1 and Fb ∈ L2 are not mateable, by showing the α-cycles lie in a common periodic ray class that must contain a closed loop, which (via Proposition 2.17) yields a non-removable Levy cycle and thus an obstruction . The candidate solution constructs the same loop explicitly from the rays with angles in Θ(L1) and −Θ(L1), notes periodicity under angle tripling (consistent with m3-invariance of Θ(L) in the paper ), and invokes the standard result that a periodic ray class with a loop yields a Levy cycle. Aside from a minor nuance (the paper emphasizes non-removability via separation and Proposition 2.17, whereas the model appeals directly to the ‘periodic loop implies Levy cycle’ fact), the reasoning, mechanism, and conclusion agree.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The paper delivers a correct, well-structured sufficiency criterion (the limb condition) for obstructions in cubic matings within S1, grounded in established ray-lamination and Levy-cycle theory. The exposition is generally clear and supported by illustrative examples. Minor enhancements (explicitly stating exactly-two-ray landing at α-cycle points where used, and a compact in-line summary of the non-removability step) would further improve readability without altering substance.