Back to search
2205.05151

ON THE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION OF AREA AND PERIMETER FOR PLANAR POISSON LINE PROCESS

A. Kanel-Belov, M. Golafshan, S. Malev, R. Yavich

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper and the candidate solution both derive the kinetic transport–integral equations for a moving secant line in a planar Poisson line field, pass to a one-end Volterra equation with sine kernel after Laplace transforms, and reduce it to a second-order ODE Y'' + G Y = ν (with a Riccati reduction). The core derivations and objects (event kernels, hazards G1/G2, the T-coefficient, and the sine-convolution identity) match. The paper contains some typographical inconsistencies (e.g., tan vs. cot and 1/cos vs. 1/sin), while the model omits the ∂/∂l advection term in its displayed multi-variable PDEs and introduces a nonstandard “local” ∂/∂P term inside Q_F. However, these do not affect the main shared result (the ODE reduction), for which their proofs are substantially the same.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The core program—kinetic equations for a moving secant, Laplace-domain reduction to a Volterra equation with sine kernel, and the ensuing ODE/Riccati formulation—is sound and insightful. However, several typographical and notational inconsistencies obscure the presentation (notably in advection and hazard terms), and boundary data for the ODE are not made explicit. The justification section gestures toward rigor without fully delivering it. Addressing these issues would substantially improve correctness and readability.