Back to search
2205.05544

NUMERICAL DYNAMICS OF INTEGRODIFFERENCE EQUATIONS: FORWARD DYNAMICS AND PULLBACK ATTRACTORS

Huy Huynh, Peter E. Kloeden, Christian Pötzsche

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves existence and convergence of pullback attractors for the collocation schemes (Theorem 3.8) and existence plus convergence of forward ω-limit sets under strong A–asymptotic compactness (Theorem 3.10). The candidate solution establishes the same two claims: (A) constructs a common pullback absorbing family via the standard a priori estimate and complete continuity to get pullback asymptotic compactness, then uses a finite-horizon tracking bound (via H5 and one-step convergence) and a triangle inequality to show A*_n → A*_0 on bounded time windows; (B) under forward assumptions (including (3.5), (3.10), strong A–asymptotic compactness with compact K_n, and (i)–(iv)) it shows ω^+_{A,n} is nonempty and compact and converges to ω^+_{A,0}. These align precisely with Theorem 3.8 and Theorem 3.10, respectively. The paper’s proofs are organized through abstract theorems (2.1, 2.2, 2.6, 2.7) and verification of their hypotheses, while the model’s solution gives a direct but equivalent tracking/triangle-inequality argument and a diagonal compactness argument. Minor differences: the model implicitly assumes a uniform-in-time one-step consistency bound, whereas the paper proves the needed uniform-in-τ, finite-horizon estimate more delicately (see the verification of Theorem 2.6(iii)). Overall, both are correct; the model’s proof follows a slightly different route but reaches the same results. Citations: existence of absorbing sets and radii R_τ (Prop. 3.1 and (3.4)/(3.5)) , existence and convergence of pullback attractors (Thm. 3.8) , definitions and existence results for pullback/forward attractors (Sec. 2.1–2.2; Thm. 2.1 and Thm. 2.2) , Lipschitz-on-balls estimate from H5 (Lemma 3.3) , the finite-horizon convergence estimate used in verifying Thm. 2.6(iii) , positive invariance under (3.10) (Cor. 3.9) , and forward ω-limit sets and their convergence (Thm. 3.10) .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper provides rigorous, general, and practically relevant results for the numerical dynamics of nonautonomous IDEs, including persistence and convergence of pullback attractors and forward limit sets under collocation discretization. The arguments are correct; some verifications are compact and could be made more explicit for reader convenience.