Back to search
2206.00714

VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLES ON SUBSETS OF NON-AUTONOMOUS DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS: TOPOLOGICAL PRESSURE AND TOPOLOGICAL ENTROPY

Javad Nazarian Sarkooh

correcthigh confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The uploaded paper proves exactly the variational principle the candidate addresses and does so via the same three pillars: (i) equivalence of Pesin–Pitskel and weighted pressures using a Vitali-type selection (Proposition 4.2), (ii) measure-to-pressure upper/lower bounds (Theorem A), and (iii) a Frostman-style construction yielding a measure with ball-decay estimates to obtain the reverse inequality and hence Theorem C. Theorem C states PB_f_{1,∞}(Z,ψ) = PW_f_{1,∞}(Z,ψ) = sup{P_μ,f_{1,∞}(X,ψ): μ(Z)=1} for nonempty compact Z, exactly matching the candidate’s claim. The paper’s statements and proofs explicitly cover these steps, including the Vitali lemma (with 5× expansion) and the needed ball estimates, e.g., μ(B_n(x,ε)) ≤ c^{-1} e^{−αn+S_{1,n}ψ(x,ε)} leading to P_μ ≥ α. See the main statements and proofs in the PDF: Theorem C and its proof outline, Proposition 4.2, and Theorem A and its proof (, , , , , ). The only minor adjustment is that the paper assumes Z is nonempty and compact, while the candidate wrote “for all compact Z”; otherwise, the arguments coincide.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript delivers a complete and correct extension of subset variational principles for pressure and entropy to non-autonomous systems. It is technically solid and follows established Carathéodory–Pesin methods, including a Vitali selection for the equivalence of weighted/unweighted pressures and a Frostman-type measure construction for the lower bound. Minor editorial improvements would further clarify constants and selection steps, but the results themselves appear sound and valuable to the NDS thermodynamic formalism literature.