2206.01336
MARKED LENGTH PATTERN RIGIDITY FOR ARITHMETIC MANIFOLDS
Yanlong Hao
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The uploaded paper states and proves Theorem A: if (M,g0) is a closed arithmetic rank‑one locally symmetric manifold and g is any negatively curved metric on M with R_{g0} ⊂ R_g, then (M,g) is isometric to (M,λ g0) by an isometry isotopic to the identity. This is explicitly stated in the introduction (Theorem A) and proved via a cocycle extension-and-classification argument in Sections 6–7, culminating in proportional marked length spectra followed by marked length spectrum (MLS) rigidity to obtain an isometry (see Theorem A statement and the Section 7 proof sketch: , , , ). The candidate solution follows the same structure: (1) R_{g0} ⊂ R_g ⇒ proportional marked length spectra, (2) rescale, (3) invoke MLS rigidity for rank‑one locally symmetric spaces, (4) conclude isotopy to identity via the marking and an injectivity result for Isom(M) → Out(π1(M)). Minor differences: the candidate attributes step (1) to “Theorem A” whereas in the paper proportionality is an intermediate step within the proof of Theorem A; and it cites Dal’Bo–Kim for MLS rigidity while the paper cites Hamenstädt. These do not affect correctness. Overall, both are correct and essentially the same proof strategy.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper proves a compelling rigidity statement from length patterns (equivalence relations), sharpening what information is needed relative to full marked length spectrum in the arithmetic rank-one case. The method via B-cocycle extension and classification is clean and draws on established boundary and rigidity theory. A few references could be aligned more precisely with the arguments, and the isotopy-to-identity conclusion could be briefly justified. With these minor clarifications, the work is suitable for publication.