2206.01657
A unifying framework for tangential interpolation of structured bilinear control systems
Peter Benner, Serkan Gugercin, Steffen W. R. Werner
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 1 states right, left, and bi-tangential interpolation for the modified multivariate transfer functions under explicit subspace conditions on V and W, with K(s)−1 and K̂(s)−1 assumed defined at the used points. The proof in the paper is given in detail for Part (c) using Petrov–Galerkin oblique projectors and indicates Parts (a)–(b) follow analogously; in particular, the argument repeatedly inserts projectors P_v = V K̂(s)^{-1} W^H K(s) (and their left dual) to collapse chains and show V v̂_q = v_q and W ŵ_η = w_η, yielding c^H G_{q+η}(...) b = c^H Ĝ_{q+η}(...) b . The candidate solution explicitly introduces the same oblique projectors PR(s) and PL(s), proves the projector identities, and carries out detailed collapsing arguments to establish (a), (b), and then (c). This mirrors the paper’s method, with the extra identity u^H N(s|δ) V K̂(s)^{-1} W^H Y = (K(s)^{-H} N(s|δ)^H u)^H Y used to streamline the left-to-right peeling; this step is consistent with the paper’s recursive definition of left states and the subspace condition span(W) ⊇ span([w_1,...,w_κ]) ensuring u^+ ∈ range(W). Assumptions match the paper’s (K(s)−1, K̂(s)−1 exist) and the definition of N(s|d) as a scaled sum is standard in the paper’s framework . Hence, both are correct and use substantially the same projector-based proof.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The work unifies disparate tangential interpolation schemes for bilinear systems via modified transfer functions with scaled bilinear terms, and it establishes clean subspace conditions for structure-preserving projection. The projector-based proof is standard yet effective; the results are broadly applicable and conceptually clarifying. Minor revisions would help by expanding some abbreviated proofs and foregrounding the projector identities that drive the arguments.