Back to search
2206.05441

The Markoff and Lagrange Spectra on the Hecke Group H4

Dong Han Kim, Deokwon Sim

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The Kim–Sim paper proves exactly the three claims: positive Hausdorff dimension immediately above the first accumulation point 2√2 (Theorem 1.1), two maximal gaps (√238/5, √10) and (√10, (2124√2+48√238)/1177) (Theorem 1.2), and a Hall ray (4√2, ∞) in the Lagrange spectrum (Theorem 1.3) . It also establishes the coding formulas expressing M(T) and L(T) as sup/lim sup over sections P*|Q of a doubly-infinite Romik sequence (Theorems 3.5–3.6) , the closedness of M(H4) and the inclusion L(H4) ⊂ M(H4) (Theorems 4.2–4.3) . By contrast, the model’s writeup mis-cites theorem numbers, asserts the lower gap endpoint √10 is realized by the periodic word (1232)∞ (the paper gives ∞(32)∞) and claims in general that both gap endpoints are attained by periodic H4-expansions, whereas the upper endpoint m0 is obtained via a specific two-sided sequence U = S*23232S (not periodic) with S = (31321312)∞ (Theorem 6.1) . The Hall-ray construction at 4√2 is correctly reported, but its explanation in the paper is via a tailored Cantor-set sum argument (Section 7) rather than by invoking external robustness results; see the explicit F+F computation and the proof of Theorem 1.3 . In sum: the paper’s arguments and conclusions are correct; the model’s account contains nontrivial factual inaccuracies and mis-citations despite capturing the main thrust.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The results are substantial and correct: positive Hausdorff dimension just above 2√2, two explicit maximal gaps with computed endpoints, and a Hall ray starting at 4√2. The proofs are self-contained, with clear coding, precise Perron-type formulas, and careful combinatorial and Cantor-set arguments. Minor presentation tweaks would further improve readability and help future readers, but no substantive mathematical issues were found.