2206.06318
Diffusion of Innovation over Social Networks under Limited-trust Equilibrium
Vincent Leon, S. Rasoul Etesami, Rakesh Nagi
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 1 states the closed-form absorption probabilities P_n^y and P_0^y and the expected absorption time τ_y for a 1D birth–death chain on {0,…,n} with absorbing endpoints, in terms of the product-sum quantity Δ, and proves them by explicitly inverting I−Q (Appendix B) . The candidate solution derives exactly the same formulas using the standard birth–death recurrence (scale function) for P_n^y and a discrete Green’s function for τ_y. The results align, and the proof strategies differ but are both valid. The model also makes an assumption (a_i+b_i>0 on the interior) that the paper implicitly uses when calling interior states transient; making it explicit would improve clarity.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The theorem and its application to the LTE diffusion model are correct and well-integrated. The explicit inverse proof is sound and yields the standard birth–death formulas used later in the paper’s numerical and managerial discussions. Minor clarifications (interior transience/absorption assumptions; empty-product convention) would further improve accessibility.