2207.02480
Periodic Center Manifolds and Normal Forms for DDEs in the Light of Suns and Stars
Bram Lentjes, Len Spek, Maikel M. Bosschaert, Yuri A. Kuznetsov
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper rigorously establishes a periodic, finite‑dimensional center manifold for translated time‑dependent DDEs via sun–star calculus, using (i) an exponential trichotomy (Hypothesis 1), (ii) a crucial embedding hypothesis (Hypothesis 2), (iii) a carefully constructed Green operator K^η_s, and (iv) a δ‑modification of the nonlinearity to obtain a uniform (small) global Lipschitz constant needed for a contraction on the two‑sided weighted space BC^η_s(R,X). This yields Theorem 14 in the abstract setting and Corollary 17 for classical DDEs, including periodicity and C^k/C^{k−1} smoothness claims . By contrast, the candidate solution omits the δ‑modification (Section 3.3) and directly sets f=j^{-1}R, which is not justified since R(t,u) need not lie in j(X); in the paper, j^{-1} is used only after projecting into subspaces guaranteed by Hypothesis 2 so that the integrals take values in j(X) . Without the δ‑modification, a uniform contraction on BC^η_s(R,X) is not secured because the weighted norm does not control |u(t)| pointwise for all t, so a merely local Lipschitz constant at 0 does not suffice for the two‑sided Lyapunov–Perron map (the paper’s Proposition 6 and Theorem 8 address exactly this gap) .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} This manuscript closes a technical gap by proving the existence and smoothness of periodic center manifolds for classical DDEs under a rigorous sun–star framework. The argument carefully treats the nonreflexive dual setting, constructs a two-sided Green operator with trichotomy estimates, employs a δ-modification to secure a uniform contraction, and bootstraps smoothness via scales of Banach spaces. The results are correct and impactful. Minor clarifications would further aid readability.