Back to search
2207.02480

Periodic Center Manifolds and Normal Forms for DDEs in the Light of Suns and Stars

Bram Lentjes, Len Spek, Maikel M. Bosschaert, Yuri A. Kuznetsov

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper rigorously establishes a periodic, finite‑dimensional center manifold for translated time‑dependent DDEs via sun–star calculus, using (i) an exponential trichotomy (Hypothesis 1), (ii) a crucial embedding hypothesis (Hypothesis 2), (iii) a carefully constructed Green operator K^η_s, and (iv) a δ‑modification of the nonlinearity to obtain a uniform (small) global Lipschitz constant needed for a contraction on the two‑sided weighted space BC^η_s(R,X). This yields Theorem 14 in the abstract setting and Corollary 17 for classical DDEs, including periodicity and C^k/C^{k−1} smoothness claims . By contrast, the candidate solution omits the δ‑modification (Section 3.3) and directly sets f=j^{-1}R, which is not justified since R(t,u) need not lie in j(X); in the paper, j^{-1} is used only after projecting into subspaces guaranteed by Hypothesis 2 so that the integrals take values in j(X) . Without the δ‑modification, a uniform contraction on BC^η_s(R,X) is not secured because the weighted norm does not control |u(t)| pointwise for all t, so a merely local Lipschitz constant at 0 does not suffice for the two‑sided Lyapunov–Perron map (the paper’s Proposition 6 and Theorem 8 address exactly this gap) .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

This manuscript closes a technical gap by proving the existence and smoothness of periodic center manifolds for classical DDEs under a rigorous sun–star framework. The argument carefully treats the nonreflexive dual setting, constructs a two-sided Green operator with trichotomy estimates, employs a δ-modification to secure a uniform contraction, and bootstraps smoothness via scales of Banach spaces. The results are correct and impactful. Minor clarifications would further aid readability.