2207.06208
STRONG CLOSING LEMMA AND KAM NORMAL FORM
Jinxin Xue
incompletehigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Note/Short/Other
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper explicitly states and sketches a proof of the claimed uniform-in-ε periodic-orbit result for H(I,θ)=ω·I+εf with f∈C^r_c(T* T^n) and r large, via Dirichlet rational approximation, a KAM-type normal form, and a Lyapunov-center continuation, see Theorem 1 and the proof outline (normal form, energetic reduction, and Lyapunov step) in the text. However, key ingredients are only tersely justified: the “generic” Diophantine condition (GC2) on the small frequency vector ̟ is asserted as ‘full measure’ but not shown to hold Baire-generically in f, let alone uniformly in ε, and the normal-form/KAM iteration estimates are presented without full quantitative control or a uniform-in-ε Diophantine constant. There is also a minor but real gap in explaining why the resulting orbit necessarily intersects supp f (the proof refers to a maximum of f where the argument has averaged to F). Thus the paper’s argument is promising but incomplete. By contrast, the model’s claim that the problem was likely open overlooks this 2022 preprint asserting precisely the desired statement, as well as its concrete mechanism, so the model answer is also incomplete. The appropriate verdict is that both are incomplete, albeit for different reasons. See the paper’s statement of Theorem 1 and its proof steps for details.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} note/short/other \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript offers a promising KAM/normal-form approach that, if fully justified, would yield a strong uniform-in-ε closing statement for near-integrable Hamiltonians on an open cotangent bundle. However, several essential components are asserted rather than proved: the Baire-generic (and uniform-in-ε) nature of the Diophantine condition on the small frequency vector; complete normal-form/KAM bookkeeping with explicit thresholds for r and ε; and a careful argument guaranteeing that the constructed periodic orbit indeed intersects supp f in the original variables. These issues should be addressed in detail.