Back to search
2207.12684

SMALL DIAMETERS AND GENERATORS FOR ARITHMETIC LATTICES IN SL2(R) AND CERTAIN RAMANUJAN GRAPHS

Raphael S. Steiner

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves that Γ0(Q) is generated by elements of Frobenius norm Oε(Q^{1+ε}) and, for co-compact arithmetic lattices Γ, that almost every conjugate σ^{-1}Γσ is generated by elements of Frobenius norm Oε(V_Γ^{2+ε}), with uniformity under additional hypotheses; these are stated explicitly as Theorems 1–3 in the introduction and proved via a spectral averaging method that bounds a covering radius and then uses side-pairing generators of a fundamental domain to turn displacement bounds into Frobenius-norm bounds . The candidate solution reaches the same claims by: (i) equating Frobenius norm with hyperbolic displacement (consistent with u(z,w)=¼ tr(gg^t)−½ in the paper), (ii) using side-pairings to generate Γ, and (iii) bounding a covering radius by a pre-trace/L^2 argument to obtain displacements ≪ log V_Γ, hence Frobenius norms ≪ V_Γ^{2+ε}. This mirrors the paper’s logic: spectral averaging to show that balls of radius T≈(2+o(1))log V_Γ cover almost surely, then side-pairings generate, and finally norm–distance converts to Frobenius bounds . Minor differences are technical tools (pre-trace kernel vs. sphere-averaging operator) and the model’s slightly stronger intermediate heuristic for Γ0(Q) (“all entries ≪ Q”), whereas the paper proves Oε(Q^{1+ε}) via Ford/Farey analysis of isometric circles; but the final generator bounds coincide .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript develops a clean, quantitative route from spectral averaging to small generators for arithmetic lattices, improving prior exponents and unifying split/co-compact cases. The logic is coherent; proofs rely on standard machinery plus recent inputs (density estimates; fourth-moment bounds). Clarifying the norm–distance identity and the side-pairing step would improve readability. The results are of clear interest to specialists in automorphic forms and discrete groups with meaningful connections to expander theory.