Back to search
2208.02422

Minimizing movement scheme for intrinsic aggregation on compact Riemannian manifolds

Joaquín Sánchez García

correcthigh confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves small-time existence of measure-valued solutions to the intrinsic aggregation equation on a compact Riemannian manifold by a minimizing-movement (JKO) construction, deriving a discrete Euler–Lagrange identity, a finite-speed propagation bound spt(μ_{k+1}) ⊂ N_{Lτ}(spt(μ_k)), and passing to the limit in the weak formulation; crucially, it ensures the supports remain away from the cut locus up to time T < δ_{μ0}/(2L), establishing differentiability where needed (Theorem 4, Proposition 17, Lemmas 10 and 16, and the limit evaluation around equation (27)) . The candidate solution follows the same JKO framework and discrete EL identity, obtains the same finite-speed and δ(t) ≥ δ_{μ0} − 2Lt bound, and then passes to the weak limit via a commutator estimate exploiting uniform away-from-cut regularity of ∇W and its convolution. The main difference is technical: the paper passes to the limit using a product-measure contraction estimate and Kantorovich–Rubinstein duality, while the model uses a quantitative “commutator” bound; both are consistent under the paper’s hypotheses (W0)–(W1) . A minor caveat in the model is that it does not explicitly justify differentiability of the c-transform on spt(μ_{k+1}); the paper supplies this via semiconcavity and the EL condition. Overall, the conclusions and time-of-existence threshold agree.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The core existence result is established with a coherent minimizing-movement strategy adapted to intrinsic geometry. The handling of the cut locus via finite propagation is technically clean, and the limit passage is justified. A clearer delineation of where each assumption (particularly (W2)) enters, and slightly more detail around the differentiability on supports and the continuity estimates used in the limit, would further strengthen the presentation.