Back to search
2208.03187

External field and critical exponents in controlling dynamics on complex networks

Hillel Sanhedrai, Shlomo Havlin

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper derives equilibrium exponents β=1/(m−Γ0), δ=m−Λ0, γ=(m−Λ0−1)/(m−Γ0) under Hahn-series assumptions Γ0=Π0>Λ0 with a0<0<b0 and c0M2(Δ)>0, and verifies Widom’s identity β(δ−1)=γ; it also derives transient exponents ϕ=1/(m−1), φ=(m−1)/(m−Γ0), θ=(m−1)/(m−Λ0) using the mean‑field dynamics near criticality. The candidate solution reproduces the same exponents with the same hypotheses and essentially the same expansion-and-balance method, including the definition m=min{Γ1,Π1}, the steady-state expansion around S=Sc, the susceptibility calculation via χ=−(∂ρ f)/(∂x f)|ρ=0, and the transient analysis from ẋ≈K x^m at criticality. These match the paper’s statements and derivations for β, δ, γ and ϕ, φ, θ, respectively, and the same regularity/sign conditions are invoked; see the paper’s general result and assumptions, its δ and γ derivations, and the transient exponents, which align exactly with the model’s results and steps . The paper’s external-field smoothing condition (c0M2(Δ)>0, Λ0<Π0=Γ0) used in the expansions is also observed in the model’s solution .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The analysis is correct, broadly applicable, and well-motivated by the external-field analogy. It consolidates equilibrium and transient critical behavior in a unified framework. Minor clarifications on excluded fine-tuned cases and regularity assumptions would improve completeness, but do not affect the main results.