2208.03187
External field and critical exponents in controlling dynamics on complex networks
Hillel Sanhedrai, Shlomo Havlin
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper derives equilibrium exponents β=1/(m−Γ0), δ=m−Λ0, γ=(m−Λ0−1)/(m−Γ0) under Hahn-series assumptions Γ0=Π0>Λ0 with a0<0<b0 and c0M2(Δ)>0, and verifies Widom’s identity β(δ−1)=γ; it also derives transient exponents ϕ=1/(m−1), φ=(m−1)/(m−Γ0), θ=(m−1)/(m−Λ0) using the mean‑field dynamics near criticality. The candidate solution reproduces the same exponents with the same hypotheses and essentially the same expansion-and-balance method, including the definition m=min{Γ1,Π1}, the steady-state expansion around S=Sc, the susceptibility calculation via χ=−(∂ρ f)/(∂x f)|ρ=0, and the transient analysis from ẋ≈K x^m at criticality. These match the paper’s statements and derivations for β, δ, γ and ϕ, φ, θ, respectively, and the same regularity/sign conditions are invoked; see the paper’s general result and assumptions, its δ and γ derivations, and the transient exponents, which align exactly with the model’s results and steps . The paper’s external-field smoothing condition (c0M2(Δ)>0, Λ0<Π0=Γ0) used in the expansions is also observed in the model’s solution .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The analysis is correct, broadly applicable, and well-motivated by the external-field analogy. It consolidates equilibrium and transient critical behavior in a unified framework. Minor clarifications on excluded fine-tuned cases and regularity assumptions would improve completeness, but do not affect the main results.