Back to search
2208.03575

Upper bound on the regularity of the Lyapunov exponent for random products of matrices

Jamerson Bezerra, Pedro Duarte

correcthigh confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves that for finitely supported measures on SL2(R) with L(µ)>0 that are not uniformly hyperbolic, the Lyapunov exponent cannot be locally α-Hölder around µ for any α>H(µ)/L(µ). In its tangency-based formulation (Theorem A), it also exhibits an analytic one-parameter family through µ witnessing the failure of α-Hölder regularity when µ has a heteroclinic tangency . The model’s solution invokes exactly this theorem and the standard “unfolding a tangency” mechanism, giving a correct argument that aligns with the paper’s core strategy. Minor overreach: the model asserts a specific cusp lower bound |E|^{H/L}·|log|E|| along a rotation family; the paper’s method builds analytic Schrödinger-type families and proves the non-α-Hölder threshold via matchings/IDS counting and Thouless’ formula, without explicitly establishing that precise cusp for an arbitrary rotation path . Overall, both are consistent; the model’s proof is essentially an application of the paper’s main result, with consistent mechanism and assumptions.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper establishes a clear entropy/Lyapunov threshold obstructing Hölder regularity of the Lyapunov exponent for finitely supported SL2(R) products in the non-uniformly hyperbolic regime. The argument is well-structured, combining Schrödinger embeddings, tangency proliferation, matchings, and IDS via the Thouless formula. It tackles a natural and relevant question and yields an appealing quantitative boundary. A few places could better signpost the flow of estimates and where key tools (e.g., the Avalanche Principle) enter.