2208.09633
Normal forms for saddle-node bifurcations: Takens’ coefficient and applications in climate models
P.A. Glendinning, D.J.W. Simpson
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 6 establishes C^k conjugacy to the extended normal form ẏ = ν − y^2 + a y^3 in three regimes (µ<0, µ=0, µ>0), with ν(µ)=p0^2 µ + O(µ^{3/2}) and a(µ)=a0 + O(√µ), where p0^2=−½ fµ fxx and a0=2 fxxx/(3 fxx^2). The proofs rely on asymptotics for the equilibria and their multipliers, an implicit-function argument to match multipliers, and a basin-by-basin extension of local conjugacies, exactly as summarized in sections 5.1–5.4 and Theorem 4 (extension to basins) and Theorem 5 (µ<0 case) of the paper. The candidate solution reproduces these ingredients with essentially the same strategy (Taylor expansions, multiplier matching via IFT, and a basin conjugacy constructed via time-of-flight coordinates), and obtains the same asymptotics for ν and a. The only point needing clarification is a quantifier subtlety in part (i): a single neighbourhood V cannot be chosen uniformly for all a∈R when µ<0; rather, V (and ν(µ)) can be chosen for each fixed a. Aside from this minor presentation issue, the arguments align. See Theorem 6 and its setup (statements and parameter asymptotics) and the proofs summarized in sections 3–5 of the paper .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript rigorously extends differentiable conjugacy for saddle-node families away from the bifurcation via an extended normal form with a parameter-dependent cubic term. The argument—expansions, IFT matching of multipliers, and extension to basins—is solid and clear, and the identification of Takens’ coefficient away from µ=0 is valuable. Only a minor clarification on quantifiers in the µ<0 case is recommended.