Back to search
2208.10124

Bilinear realization from i/o data with NN

D. S. Karachalios, I. V. Gosea, K. Kour, A. C. Antoulas

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper derives the same lifted regression Y = U W with u_j defined recursively (its Eq. (4) and Def. 3), notes the underdetermined nature for a single run, and resolves uniqueness by stacking d = 2^k−1 experiments to make rank(Û)=2^k−1 (its Eq. (5)); it then constructs the bilinear Hankel Hb = OR and uses the SVD with the S_A/S_N partitions to identify Ar, Nr, Br, Cr via the standard formulas (Eqs. (6)–(10)) . The candidate solution mirrors these steps, adds an explicit induction proof for the lifted identity and a brief consistency/minimality argument for the SVD factorization. No substantive logical conflict was found; the approaches are essentially the same, with the model providing more proof details.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The method integrates established bilinear realization ideas with a pragmatic data-stacking step and an SVD-based identification, and showcases applicability with examples. The core logic is sound and consistent with classical results, but the exposition occasionally relies on implicit assumptions and terse references. Clarifying the indexing for S\_A/S\_N, explicitly stating assumptions, and adding short proof sketches would materially improve clarity without altering substance.