2208.13228
An efficient solution procedure for solving higher-codimension Hopf and Bogdanov-Takens bifurcations
Bing Zeng, Pei Yu
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves that system (8) has a Bogdanov–Takens point at E2 when (ε, k) = ((n+1)^2/(m(1−n)), n(1−n)(n+1)^2/m), with codimension 2 for n ∈ (0,1/2) ∪ (1/2,1) and codimension 3 at n = 1/2; see the explicit BT critical point and codimension split in Theorem 3.1 and the construction of the PSNF (49), where the y1y2 coefficient is −(1−2n)/n^2, vanishing exactly at n = 1/2 . The candidate solution independently verifies the double-zero eigenvalue with a single Jordan chain at E2 using the Jacobian (19), computes the BT normal-form coefficients c20 > 0 and c11 ∝ 2n^2 + n − 1 (hence c11 = 0 iff n = 1/2), and reaches the same codimension conclusions in accord with the paper’s general classification that the first non-vanishing resonant coefficient after c20 determines the codimension . Minor wording aside (the model’s remark about “codimension 3 within this two-parameter family” should be read as codimension 3 when the third parameter n is also unfolded), both are correct and consistent; the proofs differ in technique (paper: parametric simplest normal form; model: adjoint-pairing formulas for c20, c11).
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript correctly identifies and analyzes BT bifurcations (codimension 2 and 3) in a constrained-parameter planar model. The parametric simplest normal form is derived cleanly; the codimension-3 case is unfolded with clear bifurcation sets and simulations. The contribution is primarily methodological for specialists working with degenerate planar bifurcations under parameter restrictions. Minor clarifications would improve accessibility and cross-checked interpretability.