2208.13281
Periodic Points of Rational Functions of Large Degree over Finite Fields
Derek Garton
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 1.1 states exactly the target claim—if gcd(q,d)=1 and d≥2, then as j→∞ the averages P(q,d,j) and R(q,d,j) of periodic-point proportions over degree-d polynomials and rational maps on P^1(F_{q^j}) both tend to 0—and proves it via (i) an Effective Image Size Theorem, (ii) a specialization/uniformity theorem (Theorem 3.3), and (iii) generic iterated Galois groups with vanishing fixed-point proportions, together with a counting/Lang–Weil excision to control exceptional specializations . The candidate solution reproduces the same architecture: periodic points lie in images of iterates; image sizes are governed by fixed-point proportions of iterated monodromy groups; for generic degree-d maps those groups are iterated wreath products; fixed-point proportions therein decay to 0; Lang–Weil makes the exceptional set negligible. Differences are mostly expositional (e.g., framing the bound as limsup ≤ FPP(W_n) before sending n→∞), but substantively the proofs coincide.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The work is correct and extends known methods cleanly from polynomials to rational maps of fixed degree. The specialization theorem is a technically valuable generalization enabling uniform application of Chebotarev across higher-dimensional coefficient spaces. The presentation could benefit from a couple of bridging remarks and a brief explicit statement of the periodic-in-image inclusion, but overall the exposition is clear and the result is meaningful for arithmetic dynamics over finite fields.