Back to search
2208.13706

Variational Principles on Geometric Rough Paths and the Lévy Area Correction

Theo Diamantakis, Darryl D. Holm, Grigorios A. Pavliotis

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper derives the Lévy-area-corrected Lie–Poisson generator L_s f = {h − ½ s_{ij}{Φ_i,Φ_j}, f} + ½ Σ_i {Φ_i,{Φ_i,f}} (their eq. (3.3)) and, with double-bracket dissipation (DBD), proves the invariant Gibbs density P(μ) ∝ exp(−(2ϑ/σ^2) h̃(μ)), where h̃ := h − ½ s_{ij}{Φ_i,Φ_j} (their eq. (3.9) and Theorem 3.1) by showing the Hamiltonian drift cancels and the DBD term cancels the Ito–Stratonovich correction when written as divergences of a double bracket . The candidate solution reproduces this argument: it identifies the same modified Hamiltonian h̃ via the Lévy-area correction to the generator, passes to the forward operator using divergence-free Hamiltonian flows on coadjoint orbits, and chooses β = 2ϑ/σ^2 to cancel the DBD and diffusion divergences to obtain stationarity. Aside from a minor sign slip in an intermediate sentence (corrected in the final operator), the model’s proof matches the paper’s logic and result, including the rigid-body specialization P ∝ exp(−(ϑ/σ^2) Π·I^{-1}Π + ϑ s_{ij} Π·(e_i × e_j)) which corresponds to P ∝ exp(−(2ϑ/σ^2) h̃) in so(3) .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The theorem is correct and well-motivated, extending the SALT–DBD invariant measure framework to include Lévy-area corrections via a clean Hamiltonian shift. The core ideas are executed soundly and illustrated convincingly by the rigid-body example. Minor clarifications about the exact assumptions underpinning the divergence form of the diffusion, sign conventions between SDE and Fokker–Planck, and integrability on noncompact orbits would make the paper more self-contained and robust.