2209.01224
A minimal model for adaptive SIS epidemics
Massimo A. Achterberg, Mattia Sensi
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s general aNIMFA analysis derives (i) the DFE y0=0 with z0=fcr(0)/(ω fbr(0)+fcr(0)) and R0=τ z0 via the next-generation method (its Eq. (6)), and shows the DFE Jacobian is lower triangular with eigenvalues −1+τ z0 and −ζ fbr(0)−ξ fcr(0), so (in the generic case fcr(0)>0) the DFE is locally stable iff R0<1; see Sections 3.1–3.4 and Eqs. (6)–(7) . It also proves existence of at least one endemic equilibrium for some (τ,ω)-region (Theorem 2, using Eq. (4) with zE from Eq. (5)) , and excludes periodic orbits by Bendixson–Dulac with φ=1/(yz), obtaining F(y,z)=−τ−ξ fcr(y)/(y z^2)<0 on (0,1)^2 . The model solution reproduces the same DFE/R0 computation and the same Dulac function and divergence, and gives a constructive parameterization that yields an EE for any admissible (fbr,fcr), matching the paper’s existence claim but via a different proof. Forward invariance of [0,1]^2 matches Lemma 1 of the paper . Minor caveat, noted in both: the next-generation R0 requires fcr(0)>0; special corner cases are handled separately in the paper’s linearization (Section 3.4) .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The paper is correct and clearly written, with a general framework that captures adaptive-contact SIS dynamics and provides broadly applicable qualitative results. The arguments are standard yet well-executed (next-generation method; linearization; Dulac). A few clarifications on edge cases (e.g., when fcr(0)=0) and on potential boundary homoclinic orbits would strengthen the exposition and avoid misinterpretation. Examples are helpful and illustrative.