2209.02300
On Groups of Rectangle Exchange Transformations
Yves Cornulier, Octave Lacourte
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves that the generalized SAF map T: Rec_d → (R^{⊗(d−1)} ⊗ ∧^2_Q R)^d is surjective and that Ker(T) = D(Rec_d), hence Rec_d^{ab} ≅ (R^{⊗(d−1)} ⊗ ∧^2_Q R)^d (Theorem 1.4). It concretely defines τ_i(f) by summing the tensor-volume of translation fibers and then performs a simple coordinate change to describe the image as wedge-2 in §9.2, with restricted slab exchanges R_{i,c,a,b} mapping to simple tensors c ⊗ (a ∧ b) and spanning the target; the kernel is shown to be the derived subgroup (Proposition 9.10) . The candidate solution defines the same τ (up to the paper’s coordinate permutation σ_i) and uses the same slab two-interval exchanges to generate the image, then cites the paper’s structural result Ker(τ)=D(Rec_d). Their homomorphism check relies on the tensor-volume’s additivity/translation-invariance exactly as in the paper’s setup (Proposition 3.4) . Both arguments align on generators (restricted shuffles/rectangle transpositions) used to control the derived subgroup and abelianization (Theorems 1.2 and 1.3) .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript cleanly generalizes the SAF abelianization to higher-dimensional rectangle exchange groups, identifies generators, and proves simplicity of the derived subgroup. The approach is conceptually natural and extends classical IET insights. Exposition is mostly clear; a few additions (worked examples, more explicit coordinate-change description) would further help readers.