2209.02913
A stochastic agent-based model to evaluate COVID-19 transmission influenced by human mobility
Kejie Chen, Yanqing Li, Rongxin Zhou, Xiaomo Jiang
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper empirically reports bistability, thresholds, and a hysteresis-like loop in an agent-based Mob–Cov model, but offers no rigorous mathematical argument for why these phase boundaries occur or when they should be expected; key mechanistic components (e.g., infection when multiple infectors are present) are also described inconsistently (text says Pj = sum_i Pij, while the pseudocode induces a 1−∏(1−Pij) rule) . The candidate model provides a plausible theoretical framework (finite-state absorbing Markov chain, quasi-stationarity, coupling/branching bounds leading to sub/supercritical regimes, and monotonicity of a Herfindahl-type co-location index) that qualitatively reproduces the paper’s findings on c1 thresholds (≈[0.25, 0.4]), low-mobility ratios (≈≥0.6), and population-size windows (≈[400, 500]) . However, the theoretical development remains at the level of proof sketches with rough bounds and additional unverified assumptions (e.g., independence, irreducibility of the nonabsorbing subchain, exponentially long metastability), so it is not yet a complete proof.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The simulation study is carefully executed and the observed phase structure is compelling. However, without a consistent infection rule and without theoretical derivations for thresholds and hysteresis, the paper remains descriptive. The candidate model sketches a promising and conceptually sound route to a theory that could justify the reported diagrams. Consolidating both into a coherent, mathematically grounded manuscript would significantly improve the contribution.