Back to search
2209.03724

On the dynamics and integrability of the Ziegler pendulum

Ivan Yu. Polekhin

incompletemedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper correctly identifies the k2=0 reduced system’s reversibility and states the existence of two-parameter families of periodic solutions under three parameter regimes, then infers local Jacobi integrability. However, its proofs for Propositions 5–7 use only a symmetry lemma and a crossing argument, without rigorously justifying persistence of transverse crossings and families under small parameter perturbations (no explicit implicit-function or normal form/Lyapunov-center argument). The model supplies a precise reversible-systems proof: it identifies the line of equilibria E_w, computes the linearization with spectrum {0, ± i ω(w)}, and applies the reversible Lyapunov-center mechanism to obtain symmetric periodic orbits and local integrability. One caveat is that the model’s case (k1=0, F<0) implicitly assumes sign(Ā12/Ā22)>0 to claim uniform ellipticity; this mild extra hypothesis should be stated. Net: the model gives a rigorous proof (with a small missing hypothesis) where the paper’s argument is conceptually sound but incomplete.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript offers a clear, well-motivated analysis of the Ziegler pendulum in the reversible (\$k\_2=0\$) case, connecting symmetry to the existence of periodic solutions and local integrability, and complementing this with numerical observations elsewhere. The primary weakness is that key persistence results (Propositions 5–7) are only sketched. A concise implicit-function/shooting argument or a reference to a reversible Lyapunov-center theorem would make these claims rigorous without significantly lengthening the paper.