2209.05823
ALGEBRAIC SEMIGROUP ACTIONS I. C*-ALGEBRAS AND GROUPOIDS
Chris Bruce, Xin Li
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves pure infiniteness under minimality by handling all basic opens of the boundary tight spectrum ∂Ê̂ in two cases and using minimality in a crucial index argument, via Lemmas 4.24 and 4.25, to assemble paradoxical bisections for arbitrary compact-open sets (Theorem 4.21) . The candidate solution only treats sets of the special form D(g,s) attached to Hs=σs(G), asserts (incorrectly) that these form a compact-open basis of ∂Ê̂, and then tries to pass to general compact-opens by covering them with such D(g,s). In the paper, basic opens are of the more general form ∂Ê̂(gC; {hiDi}) with C ranging over all constructible subgroups C (not just Hs), and the proof uses minimality to move between these constructs and to ensure indices/finiteness needed for paradoxical decompositions . The model’s omission of minimality and its unsupported basis claim break the argument for general compact-open sets.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The minimality implies pure infiniteness theorem is convincingly established in a general non-Hausdorff setting using inverse semigroup techniques. The structure is clear, and the chain of lemmas (especially Lemmas 4.24–4.25) is effectively leveraged. Minor clarifications would further help readers trace precisely where minimality is essential and how the decomposition of basic opens is orchestrated.