2209.06868
Technical Report on Optimal Linear Multiple Estimation for Landmark-Based Planning via Control Synthesis
Chenfei Wang, Roberto Tron
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Proposition 4 solves min_{Wi} K̄2 ΣW K̄2^T with ΣW=∑i Wi Σi Wi^T and ∑i Wi=I, yielding Wi=((∑j Σj^{-1})^{-1}) Σi^{-1}, independent of K̄2 (their eqs. (19)–(20), with a KKT/regularization argument in Appendix B) . The candidate solution proves the same optimizer by a different route: a Loewner-order lower bound ΣW ⪰ (∑i Σi^{-1})^{-1}, then shows trace optimality for any M=K̄2^T K̄2 ⪰ 0 and characterizes uniqueness when M ≻ 0. Both reach the same weights and independence of K̄2; the paper does not discuss uniqueness, whereas the model does.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The main optimization contribution (first-virtual-landmark fusion weights) is correct, practically relevant, and well motivated. The KKT proof is standard and essentially complete, with minor notational issues (trace omission) and implicit assumptions (Σi invertible) that should be stated. Clarifying uniqueness conditions and the innocuous role of the regularization would further strengthen the presentation.