Back to search
2209.13127

Koopman Reduced Order Modeling with Confidence Bounds

Ryan Mohr, Maria Fonoberova, Igor Mezić

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

Equations (17)–(19) in Section 2.3.1 of the paper follow immediately from the modal/innovation decomposition and the fact that PM is the orthogonal projector onto M; see the setup and decomposition (5)–(11) and Algorithm 1 definitions (12)–(16) for D^t_ξ f(x), r(t), ρ(t)=PM r(t), and η(t)=r(t)−ρ(t) . The paper’s own justification under (17)–(19) is the same: apply PM, use η ⟂ M to get PMη=0, then take expectations and variances . The candidate solution reproduces this argument carefully, adding only minor clarifications (existence of first/second moments and that adding a deterministic constant does not change variance).

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The three identities are correct and immediate from the definitions, and both the paper and the model present essentially the same proof. Minor clarifications are advisable: explicitly state integrability assumptions for expectations/variances, clarify the meaning of variance for vector-valued quantities, and align the notation for the deterministic truncated term D\^t\_ξ f(x) across sections.