2210.01711
The Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation
John C. Baez, Steve Huntsman, Cheyne Weis
uncertainmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Note/Short/Other
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper formulates the “stripes” conjecture—define v as a Gaussian smoothing of u_x and declare stripes to be the connected components of {v<0}; numerics suggest that after trajectories approach the inertial manifold, stripes only undergo births and merges (no deaths or splits), and the authors explicitly state this as a conjecture and note that proving it “seems quite challenging,” providing no proof or theorem-level argument. This matches the model’s conclusion that the statement was likely open as of the cutoff. The paper’s narrative supports openness (and even calls out related open problems like stripe density), so the correct combined assessment is that the problem remained open at the time.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} note/short/other \textbf{Justification:} The note is attractive and clearly written, and it raises a natural and interesting conjecture with numerical support. However, its discussion of inertial manifolds appears to conflate rigorous results (e.g., existence of global attractors and analyticity) with more tentative or conditional statements. This risks confusing readers about what is known, and thus warrants substantive revision. The central stripes statement is correctly labeled as conjectural, and positioning it among open problems is appropriate.