2210.01943
A NONUNIFORM MARKUS–YAMABE CONJECTURE: TRIANGULAR CASE VIA UNIFORMIZATION
Álvaro Castañeda, Ignacio Huerta, Gonzalo Robledo
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves global nonuniform asymptotic stability for triangular nonautonomous systems under hypotheses (a)–(b) by (i) establishing a nonuniform exponential dichotomy for upper block triangular linear systems via a Uniformization Lemma and a boundedness condition on upper-diagonal blocks, and (ii) using diagonal significance of the nonuniform spectrum to verify (G3) and then a recursive scalar argument to conclude stability (Theorem 4) . The candidate solution gives a direct contraction estimate for the difference of any two solutions of the triangular system, obtaining |x(t)−y(t)| ≤ K e^{E s} e^{−γ(t−s)} |x(s)−y(s)| and deducing global nonuniform asymptotic stability, Lyapunov stability (with δ(t0,η)=η/(K e^{E t0})), and uniqueness of the equilibrium. Its key steps mirror the paper’s structural assumptions: (a) yields nonuniform decay on each diagonal transition, and (b) provides uniform bounds on the super-diagonal columns in the time-dependent norm family that satisfies L1|v| ≤ |v|_t ≤ L2 e^{θ t}|v| (cf. (4.3)) . While the paper proceeds through spectral/Uniformization machinery and a triangular-to-scalar recursion, the model’s proof is a self-contained variation-of-constants and convolution estimate on the induced upper-triangular linear system for differences. Under the same hypotheses (including the existence of the norm family used in (b)), both arguments are logically sound and reach the same conclusion.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The paper delivers a clear advance by verifying a nonuniform Markus–Yamabe statement for triangular systems, hinging on a nonuniform extension of block-triangular dichotomy results and a careful use of Uniformization. The main ideas are correct and technically executed, but a few clarifications (explicit norm family, role of half nonuniform bounded growth at key steps, and a concise summary of constants) would improve readability without changing substance.