2210.04792
Nonlinear Data-Driven Approximation of the Koopman Operator
Dan Wilson
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The candidate solution reproduces exactly the paper’s least-squares estimators for the autonomous, reduced-order, and controlled settings, including the pseudoinverse formula [An Cn] = Γ+ [Γ; Fn]†, the truncated-SVD expression Γ+ Ṽ Σ̃^{-1} Ũ^T, the POD-projected reduced dynamics Ω+ = Φ^T A_n Φ Ω + Φ^T C_n f_n(ΦΩ), and the controlled estimator [Ac Bc Cc] = Γ+_c [Γ_c; U; F_c,n]† leading to γ+_c,i = Ac γ_c,i + Bc u_i + Cc f_c,n(γ_c,i) (matching the paper’s Equations (18)–(19), (22), (25), and (29)–(30) respectively ). The model adds a standard SVD-based lemma characterizing the full solution set and uniqueness conditions for right-hand Frobenius LS problems, which the paper omits but uses implicitly. A minor notational issue in the paper (writing sums of Frobenius/2-norms without an explicit square) is clarified by the candidate; the pseudoinverse formulas correspond to the standard squared-Frobenius LS objective used in practice, so there is no substantive conflict .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The core contributions are sound and practical, building directly on LS estimators with nonlinear liftings and POD reduction. Examples convincingly demonstrate advantages over linear Koopman estimators. Minor clarifications on the LS objective, uniqueness conditions, and the precise role of truncated SVD would enhance rigor and reproducibility without altering the main results.