2210.09470
Biomass transfer on autocatalytic reaction network: a delay differential equation formulation
Wei-Hsiang Lin
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 3-3 asserts exactly the renewal-type DDE for Xi(t): dXi/dt = −βi Xi + ∫0^t αi(t−t′) Xi(t′) dt′, with βi = ∑φ∈out(xi) J[φ]/Xi|Y* and αi(τ) = ∑π∈P1[xi]∪P2[xi] cπ fπ(τ) (with fπ a convolution of exponentials determined by Rj = (∑out(uj) J)/Uj|Y*) and cπ = c0π qπ θπ; see Theorem 3-3 and Propositions 3-1 and 3-2 . The candidate solution reproduces this pathwise derivation on the balanced-growth manifold, using the same constants and pathway decomposition, and checks the Malthusian identity λ = −βi + ∫0^∞ αi(τ)e^{−λτ} dτ, which is the paper’s λ + β = A(λ) in Theorem 4-2 . Minor differences are phrasing (the paper frames the DDE as a long-term limit and explicitly discusses neglecting P4-pathways under positive growth, whereas the model takes an exact-on-manifold view and omits P4), but there is no substantive conflict. The waiting-time convolution and rate constants also match the paper’s Markov/linear-compartment argument .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The submission provides a coherent renewal/DDE framework for scalable, autocatalytic reaction networks under balanced growth, with a transparent pathway-based kernel and a Laplace-domain growth characterization. The derivation is consistent and insightful. Minor clarifications—particularly on the exact-on-manifold versus long-term-limit framing, the role of P4 pathways, and a brief justification of the exponential waiting-time model—would enhance rigor and readability.