2210.12038
ENTROPY AND PERIODIC ORBITS FOR ASH ATTRACTORS
Miguel Pineda, Elias Rego, Kendry J. Vivas
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves that every three-dimensional ASH attractor (i) contains a periodic orbit (Theorem 2.2) and (ii) is entropy‑expansive (Theorem 2.5) via a route that first obtains positive entropy and then uses a known periodic‑orbit criterion, and later establishes kinematic expansiveness to deduce entropy‑expansiveness . The candidate solution reaches the same two conclusions but sketches a different proof strategy: Liao‑type closing for quasi‑hyperbolic strings for (i), and a plaque/area‑growth argument at hyperbolic times for (ii). While the model’s outline omits several technical lemmas needed to control behavior near singularities (handled carefully in the paper through adapted cross‑sections, partitions, and kinematic expansiveness), its logic is consistent with established tools for dominated splittings and ASH hyperbolic times (cf. Eq. (2.3) in the paper) . Hence both are correct, using different proof architectures.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript establishes two key properties for 3D ASH attractors—existence of periodic orbits and entropy-expansiveness—overcoming the lack of uniform area expansion by developing a kinematic-expansiveness route. The arguments are sound and well-motivated, with careful handling of singularities via adapted cross-sections and time-splitting estimates. Some proofs depend on external results where a few more explicit hypotheses or constants could be restated for self-contained clarity.