2210.14445
A synopsis of the non-invertible, two-dimensional, border-collision normal form with applications to power converters
H.O. Fatoyinbo, D.J.W. Simpson
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The model correctly derives the trace–determinant stability strip for L^{p-1}R cycles, the ±1 multiplier boundaries, the collapse curve δ_R = −1/δ_L^{p−1}, and the p=2 boundary lines. However, it incorrectly claims that admissibility holds throughout the whole preimage of the Schur strip and that the resonance tongue is bounded “precisely” by the ±1 curves. The paper explicitly shows additional admissibility boundaries (border-collisions) that truncate the tongue from above, so stability inequalities alone do not guarantee admissibility everywhere in the strip. See the statements and figures on the strip (−det(M_p)−1 < tr(M_p) < det(M_p)+1) and its ±1 edges, and on the collapse curve (δ_R = −1/δ_L^{p−1}), together with the explicit LR p=2 lines and the presence of upper border-collision caps that bound admissibility (e.g., Fig. 6 narrative). These directly contradict the model’s “bounded precisely by ±1” claim and its equivalence of admissibility with the Schur strip.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} A clear, application-driven synopsis of non-invertible BCNF that consolidates known results and provides helpful parameter-space cartography, with a well-chosen power-converter case study. The key claims (Schur strip, ±1 edges, collapse curve) are sound and well-situated in the literature; the role of admissibility and border-collision caps is appropriately emphasized. Minor edits adding compact derivations and clarifying labels would further improve usability for readers.